Battle: Los Angeles
Battle: Los Angeles is only a science fiction film on the
surface. The movie is really a war film with aliens in the place of human
beings and the fight taking place on American soil rather than a foreign
country. This premise is an intriguing take on the alien invasion genre,
stripping it of the glossy gadgetry that is typically associated with it and
giving the genre a Cloverfield-style
gritty shakeup. Now, District 9 took
the same approach, but that movie used the style in a way that compliments its
message and story. Battle: Los Angeles
uses that approach in order to give audiences a straightforward action movie
with aliens by way of Black Hawk Down.
Plot Synopsis: After a meteor shower is soon identified
as an alien invasion, the U.S. Army and the Marines set up bases to defend the
ocean bordered cities from further damage. In Los Angeles, Staff Sergeant Nantz
is assigned to a platoon being sent into the Santa Monica area for evacuation
purposes. However, they find themselves overwhelmed by the extraterrestrial
presence and the mission soon turns into an escape from the city.
It’s
an admirably straightforward plot, without being overburdened by any
unnecessary side tangents, but executed in a way that is uninvolving and
occasionally slapdash. The action scenes are shot in the shaky-cam style that
can work if done right, but can also be annoying if done wrong. Director
Jonathon Liebesman puts forth a valiant effort, although he ends up wallowing
in the method too much, shooting the action in almost exclusively close ups and
having his editor chop the scenes in ways that confuse and disorient the
viewer, but not in the way that they were probably intending. Even
simple dialogue scenes are done this way and when a scene arrives where we
should be able see an alien clearly as its being dissected, I ended up
“fighting” with the camera and editing just to get a clear and simple glance of
how it looks. From what I could make out, the alien design and their other
weaponry are cool to look at, but feel more than a little inspired by the
scrambled-junk look of District 9s
Prawns and their ships.
If they remind you too much of Skyline, don’t hold that against the movie because some of the
special effects artists who worked on this went off to create Skyline after finishing their work here
(and managed to release that movie before it too). That
said, a couple of the action set pieces do work despite the fast-and-loose
technique, notably an attack on top of a freeway and the final standoff against
a larger threat (which succeeds despite a grossly unexplained plot hole in the
setup). The dirty feel of the combat is also a refreshing juxtaposition against
the otherworldly technology of the aliens. Liebesman wants to achieve the Jaws effect of keeping the enemy hidden
or seen from far away, and he mostly accomplishes that in the battle scenes.
Just
as with any other movie of this type (such as Independence Day), the characters within the story are bound to be
labeled as stereotypes, and sure enough we have the rookie, the
soon-to-be-married soldier, etc. The best examples of movies that use
stereotypical characters do so in ways that help them be distinctive from one
another. The
problem with Battle: Los Angeles is
that once the introductory scenes are finished and the battle commences, the
characters are so bland and interchangeable that it’s easy to forget who’s who.
Only Aaron Eckhart stands out as Staff Sergeant Nantz, who is the only person
given some level of depth to work with in addition to being the most talented
actor of the bunch, presenting enough conviction to the role that you might
miss the bad dialogue he has to spout off (which there is plenty of).
With
only the most minimal emotional investment in the characters and action scenes
that range from competently done to incomprehensible, Battle: Los Angeles doesn’t do its worthwhile premise any favors.
With a script rewrite and less hyper-caffeinated editing, this could have been
a rousing action spectacle that puts a gritty spin on the alien invasion flick.
At this stage, it’s an unimaginative, occasionally exciting romp with no one to
root for. It’s not bottom of the barrel bad, but it rests somewhere in the
lower end of mediocre.
1.5/4
No comments:
Post a Comment