Duplicity
Outwit. Outplay. Outplot.
Outwit. Outplay. Outplot.
I had the pleasure of watching two films with
very similar themes within a short period of time. One of them was this
film I'm reviewing, Duplicity, starring Clive Owen and Julia Roberts as two corporate spies working for rival corporations. The other was the remake of The Thomas Crown Affair,
starring Pierce Brosnan as a multi-millionaire who steals a valuable
painting, and Rene Russo as the insurance agent investigating him. Both
films feature two sexy actors pitted against each other in a plot
involving mind games and deception with a healthy dose of witty banter
thrown in between the two. Each film succeeds on the banter part, but
one of them felt like it was missing something, as if there was not
really much going on underneath all that verbal wit. Guess which one I'm
talking about?
Plot Synopsis: The story
starts out in Dubai, where our two leads Ray and Claire meet for the
first time and then spend the night together. But Claire, a CIA spy, was
merely using Ray, an MI6 spy, as a means of stealing inside
information. Five years later in New York City, Ray is retired from MI6
and now works for Dick Garsik as a corporate spy trying to obtain
knowledge of a mysterious new product being created by a rival
corporation owned by Howard Tully. While on an assignment to meet with a
mole in the rival's staff, Ray comes across Claire again, realizing
that she is the mole that he must work with. The two are not exactly
enthusiastic about this team up, and we are clued in on how both of them
got into their respective positions through flashbacks showcasing their
evolving relationship over the years.
So there I was, sitting in the movie theater about halfway through Duplicity
being fairly entertained by the humor and charismatic performances from
Owen and Roberts. But at one point during one of the films numerous
flashbacks, I came to a realization: for all the plot twists, banter,
and directorial adeptness of Tony Gilroy, there wasn't a solid
foundation beneath the surface that should have me invested in these
characters. Sure they had great chemistry together when they were in the
same scenes, but after going through a few where the two of them are
separated I realized that they were merely ciphers, plot devices meant
to move the plot along through its complicated machinations. Again, this
is not the fault of the two stars, who appear to be having a fun time
with their roles and playing off of each other through their turbulent
relationship. In the end I just didn't care about either of them or
their goals. Paul Giamatti and Tom Wilkinson seem to be having a blast
with their roles as the heads of the rival companies, starting with
their brawl during the opening credits and following through with a
couple of displays of delicious scenery chewing.
Coming off of Gilroy’s Oscar winning Michael Clayton, Duplicity feels like a much different affair, but at the same time does not. The humor is a refresher from the dead seriousness of Clayton,
but the film still has that "cold" feeling of detachment from the
proceedings that would normally work in a drama, but not for a
supposedly breezy, fun thriller. It is as if Gilroy had been filming
both movies at the same time and in the same mindset, but with
completely different scripts. Also, the overemphasis on plot doesn't
help with the issue of the previously mentioned underdeveloped
characters, and it feels like there is a large amount of plot created to
hide the lack of development in them. The amount of twists the story
goes through in its running time grows tiresome, and soon become
predictable as we begin to count down to the next one, since we know
that whatever is thrown at us at the moment isn't really what it seems.
Although his snappy and sharp dialogue is nearly overshadowed by the
plot, Gilroy directs the film with adept precision and well-staged shots
that at least prove that he can still direct and that he isn't hitting a
major sophomore slump.
What should have been a lightweight, entertaining thriller in the same vein as To Catch a Thief and Mr. and Mrs. Smith has
been turned into a film that is at times funny, well written, and
confidently directed, but at the same time muddled and cold. It is not a
bad film by any means; it just didn't grab me or keep me interested.
2.5/4
No comments:
Post a Comment